About Me

Name: Michael
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

"The Man Who Saved Gerald Ford"

Video: I saved the president’s life, and all I got was … outed.

Slate
has a very entertaining mock newsreel of an attempted assasination on President Gerald Ford. Check it out.

Memo to Slate: I thoroughly enjoyed watching this. Please post more video on your site!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The 50th Post!

This is the 50st post at Deschamps Blog. Whew for me. Now let's move on to some important things.

Tony Blair delivered his farewell adress today and it was quite quite good. To be quite honest, I've always preferred him over our own president. It's hard to find anyone else who can more eloquently describe the stakes in the struggle against Islamic fanaticism.

Hot Air has the video.


Meanwhile, it appears that Muslims are continuing to take offense. What a shock!



Someone brilliant in Germany devised an opera wherein the Prophet Mohammed is given the Daniel Pearl treatment. The opera has been cancelled in fear of a violent reaction.

Now, what was it one of our most popular wartime presidents once said?

"the only thing we have to fear is fear itself."

Yes, and yet we are continuing to give up free speech and expression in fear of truly irrational fanatics.

And the  "outrage" continues with  an Italian film that dares to critique  Islam or Muslims:

An Italian film has sparked a debate in the Muslim community for its representation of Islam. ‘Il mercante di pietre’ (The Stone Merchant) by Italian filmmaker Renzo Martinelli “brings back to mind Nazi propaganda against the Jews,” accuses Dacia Valent, the spokesperson of the Islamic Anti-Defamation League, an Italian group. Her view is shared by the association of Young Muslims of Italy whose forum is full of messages comparing the movie to Nazi anti-Jewish propaganda…

No, I'll tell you what brings to mind Nazi propaganda against the Jews:



From the Iranian cartoon contest.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Karzai: "Have you forgotten?"



Whoa, this is the third blog I've posted today. I guess there's just too much going on today.

Hamid Karzai basically summed up what we must be doing in response to Islamic facism, and summed it up eloquentually and beautifully. The video is at Hot Air. I'll update this post when I find the transcript.

OTHERWISE: I think I'm finally settling down in the Townhall.com blogger "community." I was surprised to find six comments in the "No money in Liberal Radio" post.

UPDATE: Okay, so Radio Blogger has posted the audio and the transcript of Karzai's remarks. Mandatory reading, y'all:

Ma'am, before I go to the remarks by my brother, President Musharraf, terrorism was hurting us way before Iraq, or September 11th. The President mentioned some examples of it. These extremist forces were killing people in Afghanistan and around for years, closing schools, burning mosques, killing children, uprooting vineyards with vine trees, grapes hanging on them, forcing populations to poverty and misery. They came to America on September 11th, but they were attacking you before September 11th in other parts of the world. We are a witness in Afghanistan as to what they are and how they can hurt. You are a witness in New York. Do you forget people jumping off the 80th floor, or 70th floor when the planes hit them? Can you imagine what it would be for a man or a woman to jump off that high? Who did that? And where are they now? And how do we fight them? How do we get rid of them, other than going after them? Should we wait for them to come and kill us again? That's why we need more action around the world, in Afghanistan and elsewhere, to get them defeated, extremism, their allies, terrorists, and the like, of them.

That is just too well said. I'm going to put that audio up at the Classical Liberals group page.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"You don't want to go there"



Allah at Hotair.com posted a video from 2004 with Peter Jennings where Clinton blamed someone else for his problems.

Unlike his outburst at Wallace, he's perfectly calm during the video and isn't screaming at and insulting the questionnare.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WA Senate Race

Wall Street Journal has an article on the most vulnerable Democratic Senate seats in the upcoming election, which happens to include the seat of my state's own Maria Cantwell (D-WA):
   
BELLEVUE, Wash. -- Not long ago, Democrats in Washington state were threatening to abandon Sen. Maria Cantwell to protest her 2002 vote authorizing the war against Iraq. Now, the first-term senator says, "People here never wanted to lose this seat."

The senator spoke after an enthusiastic campaign rally underscored her suggestion that disgruntled Democrats have fallen in behind her, after concluding that their protest would only throw the seat to Republicans. Now, her bridge-building and the mistakes of her Republican rival, Mike McGavick, have Democratic leaders in the East resting easier about a seat that topped their endangered list for much of the year.

Mr. McGavick, a former chief executive of insurance company Safeco, says he is making up ground. In any case, the Washington state race illustrates the fluidity of the fall finale for Senate control as voters tune in. Republicans are struggling in a hostile climate to protect a 55-45 majority on Election Day. Democrats have to seize nearly every Republican target while losing none of their own.

As I highlighted, the Journal article mentions efforts by anti-war Democrats to pressure Cantwell on account of her vote for the Iraq intervention. A couple months ago at my old blog, The Mole, I pointed out an article from the Seattle alt-weekly The Stranger where the liberal writer Josh Feit came off as a conservative in his criticism of Cantwell. Here's some of the article, so you can get an idea of what I'm talking about:

Despite the fact that Cantwell and others correctly believe the war in Iraq is complicated and requires a detailed solution (I kind of like the partition solution that Senator Joe Biden outlined in the New York Times this week), antiwar activists won't be satisfied unless, as I understand it, Cantwell says: "War is bad for children and other living things. Troops out by the end of the year." Never mind that Sunni terrorists who blow up mosques are also bad for children and other living things—and are certainly as much to blame for civilian deaths as U.S. troops.

After the sit-in—referring to Kerry and antiwar Senator Russ Feingold—one of the activists said: "We simply couldn't fathom why she refuses to take a leadership role here and publicly endorse Kerry... Russ Feingold is blazing a path that she needs to follow."

What's the point you ask? Well, I think that bit is an important reminder that it was only when Cantwell embraced Seattle-area "World Can't Wait" moonbats, that her status as the Democratic nominee was safe.

And that basically means she owes the Moonbats, and they'll be part of her base if she is re-elected.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wallace "a monkey"



Bush is equivalent to Al Qaeda.

Chris Wallace is a monkey.

Chris Wallace's question was a "sandbag effort."

That is all brought to you by Ze Olbermench.

There's also more obsession with The Path to 9/11, which I simply cannot understand. It's as if they haven't seen the movie. And more Orwellian talk.

It seems he's spared us his Twilight Zone references though, thank goodness.

UPDATE: Here's the video.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No money in Liberal Radio

If there's one thing you can say about liberal radio, it's that there's no money in it. Al Franken has admitted that he is not getting paid for his work, making him possibly the country's most famous public radio volunteer.

CARLSON: You had said the other day that you weren‘t getting paid, you hadn‘t been getting paid recently. And it made some people wonder if the experiment in liberal radio was—was failing.

Do you think? Are you getting paid? And do you think it‘s going to be around a while?

FRANKEN: Well, I said that there was a cash flow problem.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (7) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

YouTube

I've started a YouTube membership. So far I'm only using it for personal use, to share podcasts with friends on MySpace and that sort of thing. But if you're interested in watching the videos I've uploaded so far, my ID is MDFrenchman.

My personal favorite comes from Vintage Toon Cast and is called "Mr. Finley's Feelings." If you've ever felt paranoid or angry, you'll appreciate it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stop pointing fingers

This article was written a month ago, and of course in this ever changing world, much of what I talk about in it has changed. Anyway, the article never saw the light of publication so read it and let me know what you think.

In many ways, it appears the world is unraveling. A shaky ceasefire stands in Lebanon, with neighboring Syria uncooperative and Hezbollah chanting victory. Iran continues to shrug off worldwide concerns about its uranium enrichment. Japan is moving towards re-militarizing itself in order to defend itself in case North Korea throws caution to the wind.
    Oil prices continue to skyrocket. While signs point to Afghanistan enjoying a level of stability and progress that no one would have predicted during the days of the Taliban, the death toll continues to mount in Iraq and the American people are concerned that they are stuck in a Vietnam-like quaqmire.
    It’s easy now to point the finger at President Bush. In the minds of many people, he took over from Bill Clinton peace and stability and responded by acting like a cowboy, starting wars, destroying diplomatic relations and squandering the surplus. Bush obviously got us into this mess, right?
    The facts tell a different story.
    It’s often said that the Bush Administration wanted “regime change” in Iraq since they got into power in 2001. George Bush himself said that regime change was always official policy. Critics such as former Secretary of Treasury Paul O’Neill have taken this to mean that Bush misguided American policy in an obsession to oust Saddam Hussein.
    The fact is that regime change in Iraq was US policy since 1998, when Saddam Hussein kicked weapons inspectors out of Iraq. The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, which was signed by President Clinton stated as much.
    In a statement he made upon the passing of the Iraq Liberation Act, Bill Clinton uses much of the same language Bush uses when talking about the universality of democracy and freedom:
    “The United States favors an Iraq that offers its people freedom at home. I categorically reject arguments that this is unattainable due to Iraq's history or its ethnic or sectarian make-up. Iraqis deserve and desire freedom like everyone else.”
    The invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a continuation of this policy in a post-9/11 context. While not in any way involved in the attacks of 9/11, the Iraqi government under Saddam Hussein had offered sanctuary to known terrorists, including deceased insurgent leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Abdul Yasin, a suspect in the first World Trade Center bombing.
    Hussein also provided aid to families of Palestinian suicide bombers, and his government was the only one in the world to openly celebrate the attacks of 9/11. When you combine this with the fact that in early 2003, no one really knew what Saddam Hussein had in regards to weapons of mass destruction, the case that the Bush administration concocted the Iraqi threat starts to unravel.
    Iraq now is a central front in the war on terror. It is not something abstract that we can just leave to its own devices. Instead of pointing fingers and engaging in an obsession with politically hurting President Bush, we should try our hardest to make sure that Iraq becomes a stable, democratic society and not a launching pad for future terrorist attacks.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Be original

I don't know if there's really a point to linking to a post on the Townhall.com blog, but I'm doing so now.

Dean Barnett wrote an FAQ on blogging that has some critical advice:

if you actually want to get a link, your best chance is by saying something in your post that either breaks news or is an original insight, i.e. something that no one else has said.

I'm not sure if I'm doing that, but I did notice when skimming the Townhall blogs after the UN General Assembly, that every single one was saying basically the same old thang about Mr. Chavez.

Be original, guys.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Osama dead?

So all over the blogs is talk that Osama bin Laden may be dead. The talk comes from a French newspaper that published what it calls

a report by the country's intelligence services that said Saudi Arabia believes Osama bin Laden died of typhoid in Pakistan this month.

I'm not betting on it personally, and won't believe it until I hear it come from the lips of a head of state or high government official with knowledge of the situation. I remember too many newspaper reports from Kuwait, Qatar, etc. saying that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was dead before he ever actually was.

If Bin Laden is dead, it is a great strike at the heart of Al Qaeda, but it is no way the end of the problem. Eric at Neophyte Pundit pointed this out very well:

Zawahiri is just as threatening, and no doubt, there is a larger role for some heretofre unknown Jihadist.  The Islamofascist movement does not die with OBL, it just needs a new figurehead.

Many of the videos put out by Al Qaeda to rally their troops and frighten their opponents have featured Zawahiri far more than Bin Laden, including one recently that threatened France.

The problem of Islamic terrorism is not defined to one man. It is a global disease perpetrated by thousands (if not more) parasites. It is as President Bush has said:

The enemies of liberty come from different parts of the world, and they take inspiration from different sources. Some are radicalized followers of the Sunni tradition, who swear allegiance to terrorist organizations like al Qaeda. Others are radicalized followers of the Shia tradition, who join groups like Hezbollah and take guidance from state sponsors like Syria and Iran......And the unifying feature of this movement, the link that spans sectarian divisions and local grievances, is the rigid conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of Islam.

That was taken from Bush's August 31 speech before the American Legion, which I recommend you all watch or read.

UPDATE: CNN has a big section dedicated to the story. It's heartening that the news networks are now reporting it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Message to Texans

Vote for Kinky!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Chomsky gets a boost

Hegemony or Survival (Unabridged)

Audible.com has put Noam Chomsky's Hegemony or Survival on its front page, under "In the News." It's accompanied by this little blurb:

In an address to the UN, President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela called Noam Chomsky's Hegemony or Survival a must-read. Chávez mistakenly believed that the leftist icon was dead.

I'm sure Noam is extremely grateful to Chavez now for the free advertising.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In the Wilderness

It's just a matter of time before we see Hugo Chavez in Subway commercials (I'm sure he could use a bit of weight loss himself).

Rob over at the Say Anything blog reports that, since Hugo Chavez's tantrum speech where he called President Bush "the devil" while holding Noam Chomsky's Hegemony or Survival, Hegemony or Survival has moved past Mark Steyn's America Alone to #13 on Amazon.com's Movers and Shaker's List:

chomsky.jpg

Gag.

If it weren't for his socialist leanings, I'm sure Mr. Chavez would see this as a sign to get into the advertising business.

At Slate, Jacob Weisberg comes out with an argument for why it would be best for the Democrats to lose in November:

Still, there are reasons why the Democrats might be better off denying Republicans the defeat they crave in November. For the Democrats to win the House this year would offer the unappealing prospect of responsibility without power. With a slim majority in the next Congress, Democrats wouldn't be able to accomplish anything significant. The party would still lack the votes to pass health-care reform or to repeal the Bush tax cuts. But with control of even one chamber by one vote, the failure to act on such issues would now be their fault as well. Iraq and the fiscal mess would no longer be just Bush's problems. The Democratic Party will have a much clearer story line heading into the 2008 election if it is simply the party out of power and can call for a complete change.

The Democrats are already pretty darn close to being stuck in the wilderness. They're never going to make it back to the village unless they have victory in an election. It doesn't even matter if they don't gain much power, they'll have more than they do now.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Blue is in the season"

My distribution has increased. Once only published in one neighborhood newspaper, it seems I've expanded to another one. Not bad for a twenty year old Aspy. My article about canvassing for the Democrats two years ago, originally published as "Backlash of the Left," has been republished with the title "Blue is in Season."

I try to not get too peeved about international events, since I don't have any effect on them for the most part, other than voting and paying taxes. I really am pissed about Hugo Chavez's little tirade at the United Nations. Maybe this is acceptable Communist diplomacy, the continuation of Kruschev banging his shoe.

And not surprisingly, Democrats have come out in defense of calling the President "the devil." Fortunately, others have condemned Chavez.

I am fully in support of what Chavez has called for: the removal of the United Nations from New York City. If it's going to be a platform for fake populist buffoons and Islamist tyrants, then they should move it to the countries of fake populist buffoons and Islamist tyrants. Let them move to Caracas, Havana, Tehran or Tripoli.

Meanwhile, we should stick with a United Democracies, made up of the G8 members and those countries that contribute more to civilization than petrol and ideological nonsense.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive